BCBA guideStudy & preparation
BCBA Experimental Design: Single-Case Designs and How to Read Them
Experimental Design is the second-smallest BCBA domain, with 13 scored questions on 9 tasks. Here is the baseline logic the exam expects, the four designs the outline names, comparative, component and parametric analyses, and a checklist for judging whether a graph shows experimental control.
Short answer
Experimental Design (Domain D) has 13 of the 175 scored BCBA questions across 9 tasks. It tests whether you can say what a single-case design shows and what it can't: dependent versus independent variables, internal versus external validity, threats such as history and maturation, and the baseline logic of prediction, verification and replication. The outline names four designs (reversal, multiple-baseline, multielement and changing-criterion) plus comparative, component and parametric analyses. Expect items that describe a study or a graph and ask which design it is, whether it demonstrates control, or which design fits a situation.
What Domain D of the BCBA exam covers
The BCBA Test Content Outline (6th ed.) gives Experimental Design 13 of the 175 scored questions (7%), across 9 tasks. Only Behaviorism and Philosophical Foundations is smaller. The outline stays in force for 2027: the BACB's 2027 BCBA Requirements keep the exam on the 6th edition, in effect since January 1, 2025. The tasks move from vocabulary to judgment:
| Task | In short |
|---|---|
| D.1 | Dependent and independent variables |
| D.2 | Internal and external validity |
| D.3 | Threats to internal validity, such as history and maturation |
| D.4 | Defining features of single-case designs: individuals as their own controls, repeated measures, prediction, verification, replication |
| D.5 | Strengths of single-case and group designs |
| D.6 | Critique and interpret single-case data |
| D.7 | Reversal, multiple-baseline, multielement and changing-criterion designs |
| D.8 | Rationales for comparative, component and parametric analyses |
| D.9 | Apply single-case designs |
Domain D leans on Domain C: you read the same graphs, but the question shifts from "what happened?" to "can we say the intervention caused it?" The task numbers and topics are the BACB's; the explanations below follow the published sources listed with this guide.
Variables, validity and the threats the exam names
The dependent variable (D.1) is what you measure, usually the target behavior. The independent variable is what you manipulate, usually the intervention.
Internal validity (D.2) is how confident you can be that the change in the dependent variable came from the independent variable and not from something else. A study with strong internal validity demonstrates experimental control. External validity is how far the effect generalizes to other people, settings or behaviors. Single-case research builds external validity through replication rather than large samples.
The outline gives history and maturation as examples of threats to internal validity (D.3). These and related threats appear in scenario items:
| Threat | What it looks like in a scenario |
|---|---|
| History | An outside event, such as a medication change or a new teacher, coincides with the intervention |
| Maturation | Change that comes from growing older or developing over time, independent of the intervention |
| Testing or practice | Repeated measurement itself changes performance |
| Instrumentation | The measurement changes, such as observers drifting from the definition |
| Sequence (carryover) effects | In a design with more than one intervention, an earlier condition's effect carries into a later one, so the later one can look more effective than it is |
Threat names and design features are recall material, and 41 flashcards on Experimental Design are planned for launch.
Baseline logic: prediction, verification and replication
Task D.4 lists the features that make single-case designs work. Each person serves as their own control, and behavior is measured repeatedly, so every phase gives a picture of the behavior over time. Three steps then build the argument:
- Prediction. A stable baseline lets you predict what the behavior would keep doing without intervention.
- Verification. Showing that the prediction would have held, for example by returning to baseline conditions and seeing the behavior return to baseline levels, or by showing that untreated baselines stay unchanged.
- Replication. Producing the same effect again, in the same person or across people, settings or behaviors.
A simple A-B design, one baseline and one intervention phase, shows a change but has no verification or replication, so it gives little basis for ruling out history or maturation. When an item asks whether an A-B study shows a functional relation, that missing step is what to look for.
Single-case versus group designs
Task D.5 asks for the relative strengths of each, not a winner:
| Single-case designs | Group designs |
|---|---|
| Repeated measurement shows each person's behavior over time | Group means and effect sizes summarize results across many participants |
| Each participant serves as their own control | Random assignment to groups addresses many threats to internal validity at once |
| Flexible and practical with one client: phases can change in response to the data | Randomized controlled trials are treated as the strongest evidence in many research fields |
Each has a cost: group averages can hide individuals for whom the treatment didn't work, and a single-case result needs replication before it can be generalized.
The four single-case designs the outline names
Task D.7 asks you to tell these apart, usually from a description or a graph:
| Design | How it's arranged | How it shows control | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reversal (A-B-A-B) | Baseline, intervention, return to baseline, intervention again | Behavior changes each time the condition changes; the return to baseline verifies and the second intervention phase replicates | Behavior that won't reverse, such as a learned skill, and cases where withdrawing an effective treatment would be unsafe or unethical |
| Multiple-baseline | Baselines run at the same time across behaviors, settings or participants; the intervention starts on one tier at a time, staggered | Each tier changes only when the intervention reaches it; untreated tiers verify and later tiers replicate | Tiers must be independent yet similar; later tiers wait longer for treatment. A multiple-probe version uses occasional baseline probes |
| Multielement (alternating treatments) | Two or more conditions alternate rapidly, often each paired with a distinct stimulus | The data paths for each condition separate clearly | Carryover between conditions, and the behavior must be readily reversible; functional analyses often use this design |
| Changing-criterion | After baseline, the performance criterion changes in steps | Behavior shifts to match each new criterion | Fits a behavior already in the person's repertoire that can change gradually; varying the size and length of the steps, and briefly returning to an earlier criterion, strengthen the demonstration |
Practicing the designs from unlabeled graphs helps this table stick, and 63 planned questions on Experimental Design are part of full prep at launch.
Comparative, component and parametric analyses
Task D.8 asks why a study would be set up each way:
- Comparative analysis. Compares the relative effects of two or more different interventions to see which works better for this person.
- Component analysis. Identifies which parts of a treatment package produce the effect, either by removing components (dropout) or adding them one at a time (add-in), often so that ineffective or unnecessary parts can be dropped.
- Parametric analysis. Compares different values of the same independent variable, such as three different durations of the same procedure, to find an effective or efficient level.
A quick way to sort an item: different treatments means comparative, parts of one treatment means component, and amounts of one variable means parametric.
Judging whether a graph shows experimental control
Tasks D.6 and D.9 ask you to critique data and apply designs. A checklist for any single-case graph:
- Is the baseline stable, or at least not already moving in the direction the intervention is supposed to produce?
- Are there enough data points in each phase to see level, trend and variability?
- Does the behavior change when, and only when, the condition changes?
- Is the effect replicated, across phases or tiers?
- In a multiple-baseline design, do untreated tiers stay put until the intervention reaches them?
- In a multielement design, are the data paths clearly separated, without much overlap?
- Were measurement and implementation checked, with interobserver agreement and procedural integrity data?
For applying designs, match the constraint in the stem to the design: if the behavior can't or shouldn't be reversed, a multiple-baseline design; if two treatments need a quick comparison, multielement; if the goal moves in steps, changing-criterion; if the behavior is reversible and withdrawal is acceptable, reversal. The BCBA measurement and data display guide covers how to describe each phase before you judge.
A worked Domain D example written by Passy
This item was written by Passy for practice. It is not a BACB question.
A BCBA wants to evaluate a token system meant to increase work completion for three students in three different classrooms. The school will not allow the system to be removed once a student starts it. Which design fits best?
- A. Reversal design
- B. Multiple-baseline design across participants
- C. Changing-criterion design
- D. Multielement design
Keyed answer: B. Starting the token system with one student at a time, while the others stay in baseline, shows control without ever removing it. A requires withdrawing the system, which the school won't allow. C needs a criterion that changes in steps, which the stem doesn't describe. D needs conditions to alternate rapidly, which again means switching the system off and on.
Studying Experimental Design for the BCBA exam
- Sketch each design from memory: one reversal, one multiple-baseline with three tiers, one multielement and one changing-criterion.
- Name the design from unlabeled graphs in published articles you read for coursework.
- Run the checklist above on every graph, including ones that look convincing.
- Study it with Measurement. The BCBA study plan guide pairs Domains C and D in the same week.
Your next step for Domain D
Draw the four designs today without notes, then check them against the table. Try the 20 free BCBA practice questions, which include an Experimental Design item, and if Domain D stays your weakest, Weak Spot drills planned for launch work on your lowest-accuracy domain five questions at a time.
Passy is not affiliated with or endorsed by the BACB. The example item is original and isn't a BACB exam question.
Trust the source
Official sources
Exam policies can change. Use these primary sources for the most current details.
- BCBA Test Content Outline (6th ed.)Behavior Analyst Certification Board↗
- Board Certified Behavior Analyst Handbook (updated 06/2026)Behavior Analyst Certification Board↗
- Single-Case Design Technical Documentation (Version 1.0, Pilot)What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences↗
- Best practices in utilizing the changing criterion designBehavior Analysis in Practice (Klein et al., 2017)↗
- Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practiceAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (Byiers, Reichle and Symons, 2012)↗
- 2027 BCBA RequirementsBehavior Analyst Certification Board↗
- Component analyses using single-subject experimental designs: a reviewJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis (Ward-Horner and Sturmey, 2010)↗
- Evaluating the duration of the competing response in habit reversal: a parametric analysisJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis (Twohig and Woods, 2001)↗
- Clinical application of functional analysis methodologyBehavior Analysis in Practice (Iwata and Dozier, 2008)↗